BATTLEFIELD ASSESSMENT

Mulberry Gap

November 19, 1863

Hancock

On November 19, 1863 a scouting party of the 65th Indiana Mounted Infantry captured and controlled Mulberry Gap after it charged the camp of the 64th Virginia Cavalry killing 3, wounding 1, and capturing 1.

PRESERVATION OPPORTUNITY INDEX

LOW

A rating assigned for each battlefield to indicate relative opportunity and potential for successful site preservation.

Help Preserve this Battlefield

Your support helps protect and share Tennessee’s historic battlefields for generations to come.

BATTLEFIELD IMAGE

SITE DETAILS

County

Hancock

Date

November 19, 1863

Preservation Opportunity

LOW

Confederate Units

64th Virginia Cavalry

Union Units

65th Indiana Mounted Infantry

Mulberry Gap

Account of Engagement

November 19, 1863 – Skirmish at Mulberry Gap

NOVEMBER 19, 1863.-Skirmish at Mulberry Gap, Tenn.

Report of Brig. Gen. Orlando B. Willcox, U. S. Army.

TAZEWELL, TENN., November 20, 1863.

I have the honor to report everything comes through in good order. The rebel force that was at Kingsport seems to have been concentrating several days toward Cumberland Gap. At Mulberry Gap and Sneedville it is reported that a considerable force was crossing Clinch River at Walker’s Ford to-day, 7 miles above Sneedville. That is probably the force that moved down toward Rogersville.

A small scouting party, under command of Capt. Hammond, Sixty-fifth Indiana, mounted, charged through the camp of a rebel regiment (Sixty-fourth Virginia), and scattered it at Mulberry Gap last night, killing 3, wounding 1, capturing 1 prisoner, some horses, and arms.

We now hold Mulberry Gap, with small force. There are two rebel regiments at Sneedville. I expect to move to Cumberland Gap to-morrow.

O. B. WILLCOX, Brig.-Gen.

OR, Ser. I, Vol. 31, pt. I, pp. 570-571.

Help Preserve Tennessee's Civil War Heritage

Your support helps TCWPA preserve, interpret, and share the places where history happened for generations to come.

Other Ways to Support the mission

Terms Legend

Historical Themes:  Topics and subject matter that characterize the battlefield including Control of Tennessee’s Resources, Crucible for Leadership, Guerilla Warfare, Transformation in Warfare, Enslaved People, and Influence on Campaign.  Sites are identified that exhibit themes at moderate to high levels, and some sites may contain one or more Historical Themes.
 
Preservation Opportunity Index (POI):  A rating assigned for each battlefield to indicate relative opportunity and potential for successful site preservation.  The Index is generated by a model that evaluates ratings assigned for site significance, condition, risk of loss, protection potential, and opportunities for interpretation.  Based upon the POI values for each region in Tennessee (West, Middle, East), sites are indicated as having High, Medium, or Low opportunity.
 
Geo-coordinates: General/central location of the battlefield area per latitude and longitude coordinates utilized in Google Earth